EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin

I've taught all the 50+ economists I've trained on agentic coding to use @every 's Compound Engineering (CE) plugin. Recently, @danshipper , CEO of Every, has integrated a new update to CE which is particular useful to economists - his tool "Proof". Whenever Claude Code via CE makes a plan or a brainstorm document, an option will come up to "Share to Proof". This will generate in your browser an interface in which you can interact with that plan or brainstorm document and give very specific feedback to Claude Code. A big problem for economists is that they have a much greater need for certain kinds of correctness than software engineers do. A big part of getting the most correct or best results downstream is getting your plan right from the beginning. I think Proof - especially with its tight integration with Claude Code - is pushing practically in a very intelligent direction for human/AI collaboration, and I'd recommend any Claude Code using economists to try out this feature in Compound Engineering. @every is rapidly iterating on the Compound Engineering plugin, but I did a video a couple months ago on Compound Engineering which I think is still worth watching: invidious.tiekoetter.com/IQ1_5jPiQoE?si=mPm2…

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

Voice-pilled and compound-pilled. @mvanhorn is using @usemonologue to talk to Claude Code, and he's the #3 contributor on @kieranklaassen 's Compound Engineering plugin with 21 commits. Someone get this man a Plus One.

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

I'm so happy to welcome @trevin to my compound engineering plugin. Check out what he's been cooking on! And we'll do a live stream this friday to release version 3 of the plugin. Lots of cool new stuff coming!

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

I've been all over the place on coding skills for agents but I think I'm happy to settle down on @kieranklaassen 's and ( @every 's) compound engineering plugin. Thoroughly recommended. github.com/EveryInc/compound…

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

i tried both. i dont actively use either for coding. for coding, it's mostly claude code + compound engineering plugin + my own web3 setup. on hermes: - it compounds and actually learns (similar to the reason why i use compound engineering) - it doenst bloat the context vs openclaw bloating context - parallelization is better: hermes isolates subagents for its task for heavy work vs openclaw doing swarms of subagent and then your main orchestrator need to figure out what is correct i havent tested extensively to tell u more about problems but that is this weekend's task

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

👇Very useful addition to the @every compound engineering plugin!

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

Based on @RayFernando1337 's livestream I took a hard look at it. I had already incorporated the compound-engineering plugin, which really was the breakout implementation of subagents. Also, I already had a script to auto tunnel multiple tmux (using cc for #iterm2 ). Here are some comparisons of the 2 projects:

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

Spiking on the Compound Engineering plugin live with @trevin , making it better, figuring out v3 in real time. Come watch the mess. nitter.tiekoetter.com/i/broadcasts/1NGaraMBq…

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.

this compound engineering plugin is nuts @kieranklaassen . The Ideate skill alone made my idea 10x clearer.

Matched through a repo-specific project phrase query.