Imbad0202/academic-research-skillspublicPythongithub.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

academic-research-skills

Q: Who maintains academic-research-skills?

Maintained by Imbad0202 (the owner) on GitHub.

Q: How do I install academic-research-skills?

Clone the repo: git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git — then follow the README in the cloned directory.

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize

CLAUDE CODEACADEMIC WRITINGAI RESEARCHCLAUDELITERATURE REVIEWPEER REVIEWTRENDING #580

Comments0Compare Set alert Export RSS Visit repo

// OWNER · Imbad0202 · REPO SNAPSHOT

github.com/Imbad0202

Imbad0202

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize

Imbad0202

STARS39,221+1,111 · 7d

FORKS3,152+0 · 7d

CONTRIBUTORS0maintainer graph thin

OPEN ISSUES · PRS9· 0

LICENSE—no license file

LANGUAGEPython

FOUNDED—

LOCATION—

MEMBERS—

PUBLIC REPOS—

TOTAL STARS—

FOCUS—

FUNDING—

//STAR HISTORY · 12M

+39,220 all-time-window

Stars · cumulative39,223 · today

//WHY IT'S TRENDING· expert verdict · 90% confidence

ANALYSIS BY AISO.TOOLS

Single GitHub skill repo with inflated star count

A GitHub repository named 'academic-research-skills' ranks #17 in GitHub's pool with an anomalously high raw score (13.8B), but appears on zero other tracked platforms. The score pattern suggests bot activity or data pipeline corruption rather than organic developer interest.

Why now: Appeared in GitHub feed with corrupted/inflated scoring metric; no organic catalyst detected.

Raw score of 13,818,132,343 is ~57x larger than typical top-repo scores, indicating decimal/integer parsing error or artificial inflation
Only 1 of 8 tracked sources (GitHub) shows any signal; zero presence on HN, X, Reddit, Product Hunt, Dev.to, Bluesky
Single_source verdict with confidence 25; 78.5% of pool (157/200) falls in same weakest band
No 'oursRank' suggests our pipeline didn't independently surface this; only external GitHub feed caught it

Considerations: Could be a legitimate niche skill repo that gained stars through a specific community (e.g., Chinese academic users), but the score magnitude makes organic explanation implausible. No forks, issues, or discussion velocity visible. Likely star-bought or data bug.

EMERGING SIGNAL · Ignore: Do not track; if reappears with normalized scores and cross-source presence, reassess.

Sources: GitHub: Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

↻ refreshed 35m ago· next sync in 30m· sourced from 2 channels · 1 mention / 24h

see full AISO brief ↗

Methodology: synthesized from this project's own documentation, live GitHub data, third-party coverage, and multi-platform signal convergence — by AISO.tools.

// RELATED REPOS · CROSS-SOURCE OVERLAP

5 detected · 30d window

▌ FAQ · answers from the data spine

What is Imbad0202/academic-research-skills?

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize

Who maintains academic-research-skills?

Maintained by Imbad0202 (the owner) on GitHub.

What language is academic-research-skills written in?

Primarily Python.

When was academic-research-skills created? When was the last update?

Created February 26, 2026 · last commit July 22, 2026.

How do I install academic-research-skills?

Clone the repo:

git clone https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git

Then follow the README in the cloned directory.

Is academic-research-skills actively maintained?

stalled — no commits for an extended period

Where can I read the docs?

Project homepage: buymeacoffee.com.

//COMMENTS · 0

live thread · operators only

Be the first to comment.

Created2026-02-26

Updated1d ago

Last commit1d ago